164 The effects of energy and lasalocid supplementation on forage intake and energetics of cattle grazing wheat pasture

Abstract

Abstract Cattle grazing wheat have the potential to gain BW exceptionally well, but excessive nitrogen intake results in increased excretion and increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Supplemental grain with the addition of an ionophore given to ruminants grazing wheat is a potential practice for producers to increase nitrogen efficiency while decreasing GHG emissions. Therefore, the objective of this experiment was to quantify the effects of energy and lasalocid supplementation on nutrient intake, respiratory gas fluxes, and performance of grazing cattle. Heifers (n = 18) were used in a 49-d experiment that consisted of two 21-d blocks with 7 d between them (initial BW=311±17.3 kg and 339±16.7 kg, Block 1 and 2, respectively). Heifers were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 treatments; no supplement (Control, n = 6), 2.95 kg control feed/d (Energy, n = 6), or 2.95 kg feed with lasalocid/d (Lasalocid, n = 6). Cattle grazed an 8.1-ha paddock of winter wheat and had access to a GreenFeed system used to quantify the respiratory gas fluxes (CH4, CO2, and O2). Cattle were weighed on d 0 and 21 of each block, on d 15 to 21 cattle were gathered every 12 h and fecal samples were collected. Data were analyzed using the PROC MIXED in SAS. Methane emissions were not affected (P = 0.58) by treatment, but supplemented cattle had greater (P = 0.04) CO2 emissions and O2 consumption (P = 0.03). Hence, ADG tended to be greater for supplemented cattle (P= 0.09) compared to Control (1.22 and 1.00 kg, respectively); but no effect (P = 0.88) was observed for the Lasalocid. Fecal output was greater for supplemented cattle (P < 0.01), but forage intake was lower (P < 0.01) and nutrient intake was higher (P < 0.01) for supplemented cattle compared to Control. Supplemented cattle had lower forage intake with greater CO2 emissions and O2 consumption, but the Lasalocid did not affect any parameter.