143P - A systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) correlates with survival and could be a predictive factor for mFOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC)

Abstract

BackgroundCancer-related inflammation is a distinctive feature of the development and progression of PC. However, the relationship between the systemic inflammatory response and survival has not been evaluated as a predictive factor of chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of a baseline SIRI based on peripheral neutrophil, monocyte, and lymphocyte counts in metastatic PC. MethodsRetrospective review of 178 metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. Associations between overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), chemotherapy schedule and SIRI at diagnosis were analyzed. ResultsMedian age 67 years, 52% were male. First line chemotherapy regimens: 41% Gemcitabine, 31% Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel and 17% mFOLFIRINOX. Patients with SIRI<2.3x109 showed a statistically significant improvement in OS compared to SIRI≥2.3x109 [16 months versus 4.8 months, Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.87, Confidence Interval (CI) 95% 2.02-4.07, p<0.0001] that was confirmed in multivariate analysis. In addition, patients with SIRI<2.3x109 showed a longer TTP (12 versus 6 months, HR 1.92, IC 95% 1.314-2.800, P=0.001). Furthermore, we observed that patients with SIRI ≥2.3x109 are more likely to benefit from mFOLFIRINOX therapy. Patients with an elevated SIRI treated with mFOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine showed a clinically and statistically significant difference in median OS of 17 months compared to 6 and 4 months respectively (p<0.001). Conversely, the difference was not clinically significant in the SIRI<2.3x109 subgroup: 15.9 months versus 16.5 and 16, respectively. ConclusionsAn elevated SIRI (≥2.3x109) is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients with an elevated SIRI (≥2.3x109) show an increased benefit from mFOLFIRINOX in comparison to other first line chemotherapy regimens. These results raise the issue of appropriately selecting patients who would benefit of a more intensive first-line chemotherapy regimen. Legal entity responsible for the studyThe authors. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.