(141) Surgical Outcomes of Infrapubic Insertion of the Inflatable Penile Prosthesis in 175 Transmen After Phalloplasty

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Historically, inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) insertion in a neophallus has an estimated 40-50% surgical revision rate. Objective To review the surgical outcomes of a single center’s experience with the infrapubic approach to insertion of the IPP after phalloplasty in transmen. Methods The infrapubic prosthesis insertion after phalloplasty (IPIP) technique involves a horizontal incision anterior to the pubic symphysis, which allows dissection of the neophallus channel, the Space of Retzius, and the scrotal pocket. Surgical outcomes using the Titan (Coloplast, Minneapolis, MN) IPP by a single surgeon (MLC) were analyzed between October 2017 and June 2023. Complications were reviewed and categorized into erosions, infections, device malposition and malfunction, and less common events like necrosis and urinary tract injury. Results The IPIP technique was performed on 175 phalloplasty patients by a single surgeon (MLC): 156 patients had a prior RF phalloplasty, and 19 had a prior ALT phalloplasty. The mean followup was 32.8 months. Surgical revision was required in 35 patients (20%). There were 10 pump erosions through the neoscrotum, 1 glans erosion, 9 infections, 6 pump malpositions in the neoscrotum, 6 cylinder malposition in the neophallus, 3 mechanical malfunctions with broken tubing, 2 urethral injuries, 2 bladder injuries, and 1 glans necrosis. There were no instances of implant detachment from the pubic bone anchor site, osteomyelitis, nor total phallus loss. Conclusions Data for the IPIP technique using the commercially available Coloplast Titan IPP suggest a reduction in neophallus prosthetic surgical revision rates compared to previous reports. Longer term studies with patient reported outcomes are required for further evaluation. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast, Boston Scientific.