#1277 Comparing advanced glycation end products removal in super high-flux hemodialysis versus high-volume hemodiafiltration: a randomized, crossover study

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Expanded hemodialysis using super high-flux membrane, is a promising therapy for effectively clearing middle molecule uremic toxins. However, its impact on advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which is related to an increase in cardiovascular mortality [1], remains inconclusive. Previous studies demonstrated that AGEs increased over time in patients treated with high-flux hemodialysis (HD) [2, 3] while remaining stabilized in online hemodiafiltration (ol-HDF) [3]. This study aims to compare the longitudinal tissue AGEs measured by skin autofluorescence (SAF) between super high-flux hemodialysis (SHF-HD) and high-volume post-dilution ol-HDF. Method In this open-label prospective cross-over 24-week trial, twenty-two prevalent HD patients were randomly assigned to undergone two sequences of 24-week treatment periods: SHF-HD followed by high-volume postdilution ol-HDF or vice versa, with a 4-week wash-out period with high-flux HD between. SAF was measured at baseline and 24 weeks. Midweek pre-HD measurements of beta-2 microglobulin (B2M), serum albumin, normalized protein catabolic rate (NPCR) and Kt/V were obtained every 8 weeks. The amount of dialysate albumin was collected by continuous sampling of spent dialysate method and determined by immunoturbidimetric assay Results Seventeen out of twenty-two patients completed the study. At baseline, SAF levels (3.88 ± 0.14 vs 3.99 ± 0.14 AU, p = 0.463) and pre-HD B2M (22.66 ± 1.41 vs 21.09 ± 1.41 mg/L, p = 0.228) were similar between the SHF-HD and ol-HDF groups. After 24 weeks, SAF levels showed no significant change in SHF-HD (from 3.88 ± 0.14 to 3.91 ± 0.14 AU, p = 0.846) and ol-HDF (from 3.99 ± 0.14 to 3.95 ± 0.14 AU, p = 0.796), with a mean difference of change 0.06 (95% CI −0.34, 0.47, p = 0.75). Similarly, mid-week pre-HD serum B2M at 24 weeks exhibited no significant change in the SHF-HD group (22.66 ± 1.41 to 22.18 ± 1.47 mg/L, p = 0.722) and the ol-HDF group (21.09 ± 1.41 to 21.83 ± 1.45 mg/L, p = 0.577), with a mean difference of change −1.22 (95% CI −4.94, 2.49, p = 0.519). The spKt/V urea did not exhibit any notable differences. Furthermore, pre-HD levels of all small uremic toxins after the 24-week periods did not differ between both groups. Nutritional status measured by serum albumin and NPCR were comparable despite higher dialysate albumin loss in postdilution ol-HDF group (0.82 ± 0.04 vs 1.92 ± 0.12 g, p < 0.001 in SHF-HD and ol-HDF, respectively) Conclusion After 24 weeks of treatment, SHF-HD demonstrated levels of AGEs, pre-HD serum B2M, and serum albumin comparable to high-volume ol-HDF. If high-volume postdilution ol-HDF is not feasible, SHF-HD may serve as a valuable alternative treatment for stabilizing AGEs in chronic hemodialysis patients.