Abstract

BackgroundThe impact of previous cumulative exposure to CS before treatment start is unknown, while its use for the treatment of immune-related adverse events during PD-(L)1 therapy does not seem to reduce efficacy. We used real-world data to evaluate the effect of CS immunosuppressive dose (cumulative dose of>700mg of prednisone equivalent) or CS delivery modality (prolonged, daily dose >10mg of prednisone equivalent lasting >5 days, or pulsed, duration ≤5 days) over 3 months before treatment start. MethodsPatients with advanced NSCLC treated at our Institution with single agent PD-(L)1 blockade after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and on CS treatment in the previous 3 months were included. Clinical and pharmacy records were reviewed to identify CS dose and duration. According to the label, patients must not have received CS>10mg prednisone or equivalent over 10 days before start of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy and had PS≤1. Patients must also have received >2 cycles of PD-(L)1 blockade to be eligible for efficacy analysis. ResultsWe identified 62 patients fulfilling our inclusion criteria, 28 (45%) and 36 (58%) of them received a CS immunosuppressive dose and pulsed CS, respectively, 8 (13%) had brain metastases, and 20 (32%) had squamous histology. As of the general population, 36 (58%) patients achieved a durable clinical benefit (DCB, partial response or stable disease >6 months). The median PFS was 4.3 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 39%. CS immunosuppressive dose was not associated with decreased DCB (44% vs 55%; p-value 0.9), nor with shorter median PFS (3.7 vs 4.4 months; HR 1.2; p-value 0.2), nor with lower 1-year survival rate (31% vs 43%; p-value 0.6). CS prolonged exposure was significantly associated with either decreased DCB (30% vs 69%; p-value 0.01) and shorter median PFS (2.7 vs 4.5 months; HR 1.8; p-value 0.05), but not with lower 1-year survival rate (29% vs 41%; p-value 0.06). ConclusionsProlonged exposure to>10mg of prednisone equivalent through pretreatment 3 months was associated with poorer outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with second-line PD-(L)1 blockade. Legal entity responsible for the studyThe authors. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.