Abstract
BackgroundThis study is analysis the consequences of the reverse syphilis screening on the management of newborns exposed to maternal syphilis, and pediatric physicians’ adherence to the existing guidelines.MethodsWe conducted a 5-year retrospective review of the maternal population and their newborns diagnosed with syphilis. Women with positive results (TT+/NTT+) and discordant (TT+/NTT-/TT+) and their newborns were included in the analysis.ResultsPer American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the 202 newborns were divided in two groups: proved or highly probable and possible congenital syphilis (Group A, n=102) and less likely and unlikely congenital syphilis (Group B, n=100). Except for the RPR, none of the other laboratory tests showed higher odds for predicting congenital syphilis. The RPR titers above 1:16 were only identified among newborns belonging to the Group A (5%); 32 patients (31%) in the Group A and 19 (9%) in the Group B had an RPR titer equal to or below 1:8. An RPR titer equal to or above 1:4 was almost three times more likely to be identified in patients from Group A (OR 2.91; CI 1.51- 5.59, p< 0.05). The newborns with non-reactive RPRs represented 64% of the patients in the Group A and 47% of them were born to mother with non-reactive RPR also (mothers with discordant results). Among the Group B, 82% of the neonates had a non-reactive RPR and 54% were delivered to mother with non-reactive RPRs. Babies in Group B had additional work-up performed 69% (n=37) of the time; 15% of these babies were treated with intramuscular penicillin which does not follow established AAP guidelines.Statistical analysis of the laboratory tests used for the congenital syphilis work-up Result table comparing the two groups of newborns ConclusionThe reverse syphilis screening and non-adherence to the guidelines led to additional screening to half of the newborns in both groups. This study highlights the need for a comprehensive maternal history at the time of delivery that is effectively communicated between the providers. This might lead to greater congruence with the established AAP guidelines.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have