1047P - The effect of multiple interventions for women at risk for cervical cancer on their health responsibility, beliefs regarding cervical cancer, and having screening: A randomized controlled experiment

Abstract

BackgroundThis study is a pretest-posttest, randomized, controlled experimental study that was intended to analyze the effect of multiple initiatives on beliefs about cervical cancer, health responsibility, and screening participation. MethodsThe group that was addressed were women between 40 and 55 years of age who were at risk of cervical cancer. The study was carried out between March 13 and June 18, 2017 in a primary health care center. The sample for this study included 134 women (experimental group: 64; control group; 67). The 14 weeks of sessions involving the experimental group included group training and delivery of brochures on cervical cancer, training and counseling during home visits, reminder phone calls, and delivery of materials, all aimed to increase motivation to be screened regularly for cervical cancer. The control group maintained their routine practices. To prevent any ethical violations, the group training as well as the brochures, magnets, and mugs that were given to the experimental group before the sessions were provided after the post-tests to the control group as well. The study data were collected using an information form, the Cervical Cancer and Pap-Smear Test Health Belief Model Scale, the Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale II (Health Responsibility), and The Assessment Form for Undergoing Pap-Smear Test. The data were analyzed using dependent groups t test and independent groups t test. ResultsAfter the multiple interventions, there was a significant difference between the test and control groups’ Health Responsibility, Pap smear benefit and motivation, Pap smear obstacle and health motivation scores (p<0.05). After multiple interventions, the participation rate of women in the experimental group to cervical cancer screening was found to be 93% and the rate of cervical cancer screening was significantly higher than in the control group (p<0.05). ConclusionsIn the light of the results of these studies, it may be suggested to conduct studies in factorial design where the effectiveness of different methods to increase participation in cervical cancer screening is evaluated. Clinical trial identificationNCT03076879, 26 September 2017. Legal entity responsible for the studyBusra Altinel. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.