Abstract
This chapter addresses the importance of both adjunctive therapies and stepped care. Evidence-based adjunctive therapies should be considered in this strategic vision as they can be helpful, client preferred, less expensive, less intrusive, offsetting of the therapist's weaknesses, and more comprehensive. However, there may be times when what is considered here as an adjunctive therapy may serve as the main intervention. There has to be a strategic vision for the therapist to address the situation of a patient. One of the implications of this model is that most of the benefit that the patient will receive from this interaction would directly flow from what the therapist can provide. If the therapist's skills “in the room” are good, the hope is that the client will make progress on his or her problems. Thus, any limitations in this skill set will limit the benefit the client can receive from therapy. Additionally, the one-on-one format is labor-intensive and thus expensive to the patient. “Adjunctive” is defined by Webster's dictionary as “something attached to another in a dependent or subordinate position.” Thus, we are not thinking of adjunctive interventions as replacing needed face-to-face therapy but something most often in addition to usual therapy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.