(074) THE REPRESENTATION OF FEMALE SEXUAL MEDICINE AND GENITAL ANATOMY IN A USMLE STEP 1 RESOURCE

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Sexual health is an essential component of overall health and wellness. Sexual dysfunction is pervasive and there are barriers to adequate diagnosis and treatment, including lack of instruction for medical students. Previous work from our group assessed the curricula of all seven medical schools within the Chicago area and highlighted the need to standardize both preclinical and clinical materials to enhance student education, exposure, and preparation in female sexual medicine (FSM). The United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 significantly informs content of pre-clinical undergraduate medical education. Comprehensive USMLE Step 1 resources therefore assume an integral role in exposing medical students to key topics which may or may not be included in their individual school’s curriculum. Thus, it is important to assess if information about FSM and female genital anatomy is delivered to medical students and to what extent in board exam materials. Objective This study aims to assess the coverage of sexual medicine topics in a USMLE Step 1 resource and to compare the representation of male- versus female-specific content. Methods Digital copies of First Aid for the USMLE Step 1 2020-2023 versions were collected and evaluated for inclusion of sexual medicine subjects and topics for both males and females. The content of the chapters titled “Reproduction” and “Psychiatry” were included. To standardize our data collection, existing literature was used to identify specific components of anatomy and physiology related to genital anatomy and orgasm. Additionally, the epidemiology, pathologies, and treatments of FSM were specifically searched for in this resource. Results Across the four editions of the resource included for evaluation, all covered the physiology of the male orgasm, however, none included the physiology of the female orgasm. Moreover, the only mention of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) was in the psychiatry chapter which only briefly addressed the pathophysiology of FSD, but not the epidemiology nor the treatment of FSD. Furthermore, only one out of seven relevant anatomical terms describing parts of clitoral anatomy were included. Homologous male genitalia was consistently labeled for the glans penis, prepuce, corpora cavernosa, and corpus spongiosum as four out of six anatomical terms of interest. Additionally, all four editions from 2020-2023 included content on penile neurovasculature and a penile cross-sectional diagram; however, there was no mention of clitoral neurovasculature nor were there any cross-sectional diagrams of female anatomic components in any of the four editions evaluated. Conclusions Despite this USLME Step 1 resource’s over 840 pages, the representation of topics related to FSM is lacking compared to analogous male topics. Recent literature which has highlighted the gaps in FSM education and the importance of comprehensive sexual medicine training for physicians, however, there have been no significant changes to the content of this resource over the past four editions. USMLE Step 1 resources play a vital role in enhancing the understanding of FSM among medical students. Content expansion is needed to provide accurate information to patients, help patients make informed decisions about treatments, destigmatize reproductive and sexual health, and overall advance medical knowledge of FSM. Disclosure No.