(355) Sexually Speaking: How are Medical School Clinical Curricula Preparing Future Physicians?

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Sexual health is an essential component of overall health and wellness. It has been demonstrated that roughly one-third of patients in the United States have sexual dysfunction defined as persistent, recurrent problems with sexual response, desire, orgasm, or pain that cause distress. Currently, only half of United States medical schools require formal sexual health instruction, which contributes to the under-preparedness physicians experience in addressing essential issues related to female sexual medicine (FSM). Previous work from our group revealed a need for restructuring pre-clinical medical school curricula as they pertain to FSM and female sexual dysfunction. Thus, a comprehensive education in medical schools’ clinical curricula covering FSM, including standardized screening for sexual dysfunction, assumes an important role. Objective This study focuses on educational content within the obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) core clerkships of medical schools to determine if and how FSM is taught to third-year medical students as they interact with patients. Methods OBGYN clerkship syllabi, synchronous lecture materials, and supplemental resources were collected from four medical schools, including three allopathic and one osteopathic institution, in the surrounding Chicago, Illinois area. To standardize our clinical curriculum needs assessment, we limited content review to lectures and resources provided directly from the institution to students during their OBGYN rotation. Upon review of each institution’s clerkship materials, we assessed the goals set forth in each syllabus in terms of lecture or online learning content required for completion by rotating students. Results Clerkship curriculum materials were collected from four (n=4) medical schools. Three of the four institutions dedicate 6 weeks to the core OBGYN clerkship, while one dedicates only 4 weeks. When comparing the specific aims and course content outlines in the rotation syllabi, 3 out of 4 institutions included topics on FSM or female sexual dysfunction. Of these, only one institution had corresponding synchronous clerkship time dedicated to these topics as a one-hour-long required lecture for students. Furthermore, only one program offered training to third-year clinical students in comprehensive sexual history-taking practices, including screening for female sexual dysfunction. The format in which this was fulfilled was through a recommended online module for interested students to complete independently. Conclusions Our focused needs assessment of both allopathic and osteopathic medical schools in the Chicagoland area reveals inconsistencies in the outlined institution-specific goals of their OBGYN clinical rotation and the content that was available and required for students to complete. A single one-hour lecture was included at only one institution specifically dedicated to the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of female sexual dysfunction. This same school was the only of the four to offer any training in screening for female sexual dysfunction, and this was not required, only recommended. Future work includes emphasizing FSM as crucial a domain for medical students to gain proficiency and confidence during clerkships, particularly in a didactic setting that can be utilized clinically on the wards. Disclosure No