Abstract

The present article presents some preliminary results of the study of some prosodic characteristics of the dialects of Varzuga and Umba, two Northern Russian villages on the Ter Coast of the White Sea. In our recently collected recordings, we observed a number of prosodic characteristics which are assumed to be typical for Northern Russian. Firstly, vowels appear to be relatively short. Secondly, it was often rather difficult to determine the location of the stressed syllables. Thirdly, a tendency to attach a repeating prosodic pattern to each phonological word was observed. Finally, many non-question utterances ended in a rising pitch movement, although the steepness and the height of the Ter rise appear to be less extreme than in, for instance, some Pinega dialects of the Archangel' sk oblast' . Interestingly, the second and third characteristics seem to be closely related. In all but one of the cases with unclear stress patterns, the first syllable was realised with high pitch, immediately preceded and followed by low pitch. This seems to be the result of a tendency to attach a rising-falling pattern to each phonological word.

Highlights

  • Summary: Prosodic Aspects of the Dialects of the Ter Coast of the White Sea: Preliminary Results The present article presents some preliminary results of the study of some prosodic characteristics of the dialects of Varzuga and Umba, two Northern Russian villages on the Ter Coast of the White Sea

  • In our recently collected recordings, we observed a number of prosodic characteristics which are assumed to be typical for Northern Russian

  • In all but one of the cases with unclear stress patterns, the first syllable was realised with high pitch, immediately preceded and followed by low pitch. This seems to be the result of a tendency to attach a rising-falling pattern to each phonological word

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ф. Касаткиной о слогоразделении (Пауфошима 1977): в СГ, в отличие от в других разновидностей русского национального языка, слоги часто являются закрытыми, что ограничивает длительность гласных. Без специального ударения, ударение, видимо, перенесено на первый слог — костыч, хотя об этом можно спорить Хотя нельзя установить место ударения исключительно из данных длительности и интенсивности, эти данные подтверждают, что второй слог в костыч-2 выделен намного меньше по сравнению с первым слогом, чем в костыч-1.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.