Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of this topic is due to the ongoing reform of responsibility for administrative offenses, discussions in the scientific literature on the delimitation of crimes and administrative offenses and the grounds for their delinquency. The study of the historical stages of the normative isolation of responsibility for administrative offenses from the point of view of events taking place in political, economic and social life, in our opinion, helps in determining the development trends of this institution. In this article, the author aims to identify the reasons and conditions for administrative responsibility as an independent institution after the Great October Socialist Revolution. The gradual normative separation of responsibility for administrative offenses from criminal responsibility falls on the period of war communism and the first half of the New Economic Policy (NEP). Methods. The author uses the classical historical and legal research method, which includes both a chronological analysis of social, political and economic factors, and a study of the legal regulation of legal institutions over a period of time. Results. In the first years of Soviet power, administrative coercion, along with other measures of state coercion, was considered as one of the means of strengthening socialist legality and fundamental order and security. The normative separation of administrative responsibility from criminal responsibility during the first half of the new economic policy was due to the development of economic relations and technical progress. In general, it was associated with Soviet ideology, a permissive type of legal regulation, an increase in the number of rules issued by the state in various spheres of public life, the creation of control and supervisory bodies that required their own operational leverage on citizens and organizations, including in the form of imposing penalties.
Highlights
The relevance of this topic is due to the ongoing reform of responsibility for administrative offenses, discussions in the scientific literature on the delimitation of crimes and administrative offenses and the grounds for their delinquency
The gradual normative separation of responsibility for administrative offenses from criminal responsibility falls on the period of war communism and the first half of the New Economic Policy (NEP)
The normative separation of administrative responsibility from criminal responsibility during the first half of the new economic policy was due to the development of economic relations and technical progress
Summary
ПРИЧИНЫ ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛИЗАЦИИ АДМИНИСТРАТИВНОЙ ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТИ В ПОСТРЕВОЛЮЦИОННОЙ РОССИИ (1917–1924 гг.). Исследование исторических этапов нормативного обособления ответственности за административные правонарушения с точки зрения происходящих событий в политической, экономической и социальной жизни, на наш взгляд, помогает в определении тенденций развития данного института. В настоящей статье автор ставит цель выявить причины и условия формирования административной ответственности как самостоятельного института после Великой Октябрьской социалистической революции. Постепенное нормативное обособление ответственности за административные правонарушения от уголовной ответственности приходится на период военного коммунизма и первую половину новой экономической политики (НЭП). Нормативное обособление административной ответственности от уголовной ответственности в первую половину новой экономической политики было обусловлено развитием экономических отношений, техническим прогрессом, а в целом было связано с общей тенденцией обусловленного советской идеологией разрешительного типа правового регулирования, увеличением количества издаваемых государством правил в различных сферах общественной жизни, созданием контрольно-надзорных органов, которым требовались собственные оперативные рычаги воздействия на граждан и организации, в том числе в виде наложения взысканий.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.