Abstract
Preferential treatment for veterans and the mandatory military service system for men are both topics that deal with gender discrimination in Korea’s military service sector, but logical gaps arise when trying to develop different logic depending on the gender of the party subject to infringement of rights. While acknowledging the constitutional justification of only men fulfilling their military service obligations, the logic that male-centered preferential treatment as a reward for such statutory-based efforts is not constitutional justification is aimed at correcting gender discrimination. Recently, however, various discussions on military service have been held due to changes in military service technology and environment, and the existing logic of the Constitutional Court clearly needs to be reviewed in terms of women
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
