Abstract
This article examines shared decision-making, a concept that extends beyond informed consent to safeguard patients’ right to self-determination in medical decision-making, emphasizing mutuality with patients. After reviewing the relevant legislation concerning consent, we argue that there are limitations to using this legislation as a basis for integrating shared decision-making across various medical domains. We assess the applicability, acceptability, and consistency of this legislation within the medico-legal system. In particular, we scrutinize the roles of so-called “participants” in shared decision-making, the content of shared information, and potential legal liabilities stemming from deficiencies in this process. Through this examination, we analyze legal precedents concerning the duty to inform and propose policy adjustments necessary for the institutionalization of shared decision-making within the medico-legal framework.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
