Abstract
Econometric evaluation of economic growth sustainability of various regions
 is provided. As it is stated, for the period of 1998–2012 economies of the North
 Caucasian and the Far Eastern federal districts tended to develop more sustainably,
 while economies of the Central and the Urals federal districts tended to
 develop less sustainably. Within the North Caucasian federal region, it was the
 Kabardino-Balkar Republic, that showed the most sustainable economic growth.
 Similarly, during the same period the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) within the Far
 East federal district, the Krasnoyarsk Region within the Siberian federal district,
 the Leningrad Region within the North-West federal district and the Republic of
 Adygea within the Southern federal district were leaders in terms of sustainable
 development within their federal districts. As for the Volga federal district,
 the most sustainable economic growth was observed in the Republic of
 Bashkortostan; within the Urals federal district the most sustainable growth was
 observed in the Sverdlovsk Region and within the Central federal district —
 in Belgorod Region. The need to differentiate anti-crisis economic policy towards
 separate regions, dependant on the propensity of a regional economic system for
 sustainable economic growth, is emphasized.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
