Abstract
The author disputes the assessments of P.A. Stolypin by a number of authors, based on the erroneous methodology of the "class approach". He proposes a view, which is traditional for Russian thought, and considers the mission of the reformer as complex, aimed at a nationwide "Russian revival", in which the agrarian reform was only one of the means of the necessary "National revival". P.A. Stolypin knew quite like Pushkin that the Empire needed correction the pro-Western “Petersburg deviation” from the spirit of nationality by the legitimate supreme power, but not its revolutionary destruction.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Izvestiya of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. History Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
