Abstract
There is no final conclusion about whether theft adheres to “secret theft” or compatible with “blatant theft” in terms of objective behavior. Although traditional theories occupy the main position in judicial practice, there have been judgments that agree with the theory of “blatant theft”. Through the analysis of cases that adopt the theory of “blatant theft” in judicial practice, this paper examines the specific problems faced by the theory of blatant theft in the application of judicial practice. After that, this paper further demonstrates the rationality of embedding the blatant theft theory into judicial practice, and puts forward the specific approach of embedding this theory into judicial practice.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
