Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify the status of appropriate community supporting systems through analysis of local government ordinances after deinstitutionalization of the disabled in the facility. To achieve this, Pusan government ordinance analysis was conducted. Since there is no deinstitutionalization support law, the existing ordinances related to deinstitutionalization of local governments are the basis. This is because macro-practice has a great influence on mezzo- and micro-practice. In this study, ordinances related to housing, lifelong education, communication support and human rights were analyzed as in the local independent living. Content analysis was used as the research method. As a framework for analysis, the composition of ordinances, rights and accountability, validity of the target scope, type and degree of benefits, financial responsibility, and securing of delivery system were used. In order to make a more active and persuasive argument, a comparative analysis was conducted with the ordinances related to deinstitutionalization in Seoul. Conclusions and recommendations are presented based on the analysis results.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
