Abstract
The article justifies the conclusion that the practice of bringing judges to disciplinary liability in the form of early termination of powers only based on results of criminal intelligence and surveillance operations submitted to the judicial community directly by law enforcement authorities does not meet the criterion of legality as such results are verified by procedural means and have no evidentiary value in bringing a person to legal liability.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
