Abstract
Postmodern literature radically reconsiders traditional values and ideas, abandons the established standards and gives provocative non-canonical interpretations of some immortal characters of the world literature. The article analyzes this tendency through the interpretations of John Dee’s character in postmodern novels « Foucault's Pendulum» by Umberto Eco (1988) and «The House of Doctor Dee» by Peter Ackroyd (1994), each of them, in their own way, reconsidered the traditional comprehension of the Faustian scientist. The former gives an ironic sketch of John Dee’s life in the insert story of «Foucault's Pendulum», the latter presents a monumental description of the alchemist in the context of his own and the author’s time. But both authors pursue an obvious goal, showing fundamental ambiguity of receptions and the absence of absolute Truth, they synthesize different, sometimes opposite, opinions of John Dee, using a playful narrative mode they degrade the traditional image of the magician.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.