Abstract
The article studies problems of the institution of representation in a civil procedure. Based on a retrospective analysis of civil procedure laws, foreign experience, the author concludes that the losing party to a case should not pay to the person that has provided unqualified legal assistance in such case. “Reasonable limits” as a criterion for determination of the amount of compensation of expenses on a judicial representative does not make the judicial practice more certain. Qualified legal assistance has a market price; however, it is reasonable to introduce state tariffs with regards to compensation of expenses on a judicial representative to avoid abusive practices.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.