“Словник місцевих слів, у літературній мові не вживаних” Івана Огієнка як джерело діалектологічних досліджень

Abstract

A great importance of lexicographical work has been given by Ivan Ohiienko, a Ukrainian philologist, pedagogue and church and public fi gure, researcher of the Ukrainian language and ancient Ukrainian literature.«Ukrainian Stylistic Dictionary», «Dictionary of Local Words, Not Used in Literary Language», «Grammar and Stylistic Dictionary of Shevchenko’s Language», are his unique works in Ukrainian studies, which contain rich mate-rial with relevant comments.The lexico-stylistic aspect of the vocabulary, defi ned by I. Ohiienko as non-normative one, has been analyzed in the article on the basis of the materials of the «Dictionary of Local Words Not Used in Literary Language». The analysis of these words made it possible to divide them into several groups.The fi rst group includes dialect words that diff er in phonetic and morpho-logical features, in particular: the use of [ф] instead of [хв], [х], [п] (гафтувати, фалити, филя, фіст), the transition of the middle [л] after vowels into [ў] (graphically into в): горівка, forms of the words хтіти, хтять, хтів, хтіла, using of [л], [н] after labials (здоровля,мнясо,мнята, мнякий), the hardness of the consonant [р’] (виратувати, базарувати, байструк, мрака), the absence of elongated consonants in the nouns of the middle gender of the II declension (волося), the infi nitive form on -чи: (допечи, зберегчи, змогчи, набічи), using of forms with the non-syllabic [і] (пійти), using of [у] instead of [о]: (кумпанія, удуд,робучий), dialectal forms of numerals: (одинайцять, дванайцять).The second group of words consists of lexical dialectical units recorded in lexicographical works with the appropriate remark: (банно, банувати, бинда, борше, встеклий, ґвер, рискаль, дуфати, фрайтер).The third group includes words that have become literary (австрієць, Бухарест, паспорт, анекдот, гіпноз, etc.)