Abstract
The article deals with the concept of I. Franko on the development and functioning of the Ukrainian language and its dialects. On the basis of works of the author’s works "Literary language and dialects" and "Speak of the wolf – say for the wolf", modern views on the problem of national and literary language have been formed. The historical-stylistic approach allows to comprehensively analyze Franko’s views on key linguistic concepts – literary language and literary norm as well as a tangent to it – dialectal speech, linguistic flair, the culture of speech, etc. The role of I. Franko in the language disputes at the end of the 19th century is being outlined, in particular his work assesses and determines the role of the figure in the views of contemporary linguistic problems, the place of dialects in the language system, the dynamics of language processes at the end of 19th and beginning of 20th centuries, new trends in the development of lexical and phraseological fund of the Ukrainian language, the enrichment of the stylistic resource of the Ukrainian language, the role of socio-political processes on the state and quality of the Ukrainian language, etc. The author makes a digression to the life and work of I. Franko, specifically to scientific contacts with V. Jagić, J. Collares, M. Grushevsky which allowed to trace the interdependence in the problems of the formation and functioning of the literary language in Serbia and Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Slovenia, and Macedonia. Consideration of the "single Ukrainian language" for Franko is a key issue addressed in the works of both scientific and journalistic nature. It is important that both Franko and his contemporaries-Slavists, saw in the unity of the language a mental-national character of Ukrainians, which is confirmed by the epistolary heritage of the scientist and can be promising for further analysis of current problems of the Ukrainian language past and present.
Highlights
The article deals with the concept of I
We focus on four his works that are related to language functions and communication processes
"it seems that the speech is something common to all of us, but there is no doubt that as every child in the first years produces its own separate jargon, and every writer, especially talented, produces its own language, has its own characteristic expressions, figures of speech, its structure of phrases, their favorite words" [7, р. 77]
Summary
Франка щодо розвитку та функціонування української мови та її діалектів. Історико-стилістичний підхід дозволяє комплексно проаналізувати думки Франка щодо ключових мовознавчих понять – літературна мова та літературна норма, а також дотичних до них – діалектна мова, мовне чуття, культура мови та ін. ХІХ ст., зокрема дається оцінка та визначається роль діяча у поглядах на актуальні для сучасників мовознавчі проблеми. Місце діалектів у системі мови, динаміка мовних процесів кін. Розгляд "єдиної української мови" для Франка – ключове питання, що аналізується у працях як наукового, так і публіцистичного характеру. Що і Франко, і його сучасники-славісти, вбачали в єдності мови ментально-національний характер українців, що ілюстровано епістолярною спадщиною науковця та може стати перспективним для подальшого аналізу актуальних проблем української мови. Глієра; асистент кафедри української та російської мов як іноземних; Інститут філології; Київський національний університет імені Тараса Шевченка
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
