Abstract
The article deals with a question of eliminating judicial mistakes in the reviewing of judicial acts on newly discovered or new circumstances. Depending on the answer to this question, a review due to newly discovered or new circumstances can be considered as one of the types of verification proceedings or as an independent procedural stage. Until now, this issue in the doctrine remains unresolved, and therefore there is no unified approach, and unreasonable conclusions are made about the identity between the supervisory proceedings and the revision due to newly discovered or new circumstances, which in general contradicts the procedural legislation and the goals of the revision in particular.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
