Abstract

The article considers the history of the formation of poetic morphology as a section of linguistic poetics, the tasks that this direction faces today. Research axioms have been formulated, which became the basis for solving the problem of creating a systematic poetic morphology of the Russian language: the axiom of expressiveness, the axiom of expressiveness of breaking the morphological norm, the axiom of integrity and compositionality, the axiom of the transition of the individual to the stable, and the stable to the general poetical. It is assumed that these axioms can be used in the description of the poetic morphology of different languages. Poetic means of actualization of normative morphological forms and meanings have been characterized: juxtaposition, thickening, attraction. Juxtaposition in the structure of the verse line of forms and meanings of word forms of different parts of speech with a common root or grammemes belonging to the same paradigm series, actualizes or neutralizes grammatical meanings. Thickening of homogeneous morphological forms and values in the maximum realization leads to the formation of a morphological dominant of the text or its fragment. Attraction is associated with the adaptation of morphological forms. It is argued that the development of linguistics in the field of morphological poetic: the study of poetic-morphological motifs, morphological dominants of different types, the grammatical basis of individual linguocultural types is significant not only for understanding the patterns of poetic language, but also for linguistic creative practice in general. Key words: poetic morphology, actualization, means of actualization, morphological meanings, linguistic creative practice.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call