Abstract
A study of individual public legal mechanisms for alternative dispute resolution was carried out. The content of the concept of alternative dispute resolution is revealed, a conclusion is formulated about the need to develop public legal mechanisms for al-ternative dispute resolution as the obligation of the state to ensure adequate protection of rights and legitimate interests in the context of these mechanisms. The content and features of individual public mechanisms for resolving disputes are revealed using the example of adjudication, dispute resolution by the state ombudsman, as well as courts of aksakals and councils of biys. The conclusion is made about the admissibility of the reception of foreign models of public legal mechanisms for alternative dispute resolution through the prism of the established practice of dispute resolution and the use of alternative methods of dispute res-olution, as well as, taking into account ethnic and cultural aspects, the compliance of public legal mechanisms for alternative dis-pute resolution with the values of society and the presence of potential the demand for such procedures among citizens.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
