Abstract
Introduction: this paper focuses on the legal problems of applying the artificial intelligence technology when solving socio-economic problems. The convergence of two disruptive technologies – Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Data Science – has created a fundamental transformation of social relations in various spheres of human life. A transformational role was played by classical areas of artificial intelligence such as algorithmic logic, planning, knowledge representation, modeling, autonomous systems, multiagent systems, expert systems (ES), decision support systems (DSS), simulation, pattern recognition, image processing, and natural language processing (NLP), as well as by special areas such as representation learning, machine learning, optimization, statistical modeling, mathematical modeling, data analytics, knowledge discovery, complexity science, computational intelligence, event analysis, behavior analysis, social network analysis, and also deep learning and cognitive computing. The mentioned AI and Big Data technologies are used in various business spheres to simplify and accelerate decision-making of different kinds and significance. At the same time, self-learning algorithms create or reproduce inequalities between participants in circulation, lead to discrimination of all kinds due to algorithmic bias. Purpose: to define the areas and directions of legal regulation of algorithmic bias in the application of artificial intelligence from the legal perspective, based on the analysis of Russian and foreign scientific concepts. Methods: empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic; special scientific methods such as the legal-dogmatic method and the method of interpretation of legal norms. Results: artificial intelligence has many advantages (it allows us to improve creativity, services and lifestyle, to enhance the security, helps in solving various problems), but at the same time it causes numerous concerns due to the harmful effects on individual autonomy, privacy, and fundamental human rights and freedoms. Algorithmic bias exists even when the algorithm developer has no intention to discriminate, and even when the recommendation system does not accept demographic information as input: even in the absence of this information, due to thorough analysis of the similarities between products and users, the algorithm may recommend a product to a very homogeneous set of users. The identified problems and risks of AI bias should be taken into consideration by lawyers and developers and should be mitigated to the fullest extent possible, both when developing ethical principles and requirements and in the field of legal policy and law at the national and supranational levels. The legal community sees the opportunity to solve the problem of algorithmic bias through various kinds of declarations, policies, and standards to be followed in the development, testing, and operation of AI systems. Conclusions: if left unaddressed, biased algorithms could lead to decisions that would have a disparate collective impact on specific groups of people even without the programmer’s intent to make a distinction. The study of the anticipated and unintended consequences of applying AI algorithms is especially necessary today because the current public policy may be insufficient to identify, mitigate, and remedy the effects of such non-obvious bias on participants in legal relations. Solving the issues of algorithmic bias by technical means alone will not lead to the desired results. The world community recognizes the need to introduce standardization and develop ethical principles, which would ensure proper decision-making with the application of artificial intelligence. It is necessary to create special rules that would restrict algorithmic bias. Regardless of the areas where such violations are revealed, they have standard features of unfair behavior of the participants in social relations and can be qualified as violations of human rights or fair competition. Minimization of algorithmic bias is possible through the obligatory introduction into circulation of data in the form that would not allow explicit or implicit segregation of various groups of society, i.e. it should become possible to analyze only data without any explicit attributes of groups, data in their full diversity. As a result, the AI model would be built on the analysis of data from all socio-legal groups of society.
Highlights
The research was prepared within the framework of the Program for Development of the Interdisciplinary Scientific and Educational School of the Moscow University “Mathematical Methods of Analysis of Complex Systems”
Introduction: this paper focuses on the legal problems of applying the artificial intelligence technology when solving socio-economic problems
Элементы Стандарта включают: набор рекомендаций по тому, что нужно делать при разработке или использовании алгоритмических систем, следуя принципиальной методологии взаимодействия с заинтересованными сторонами (людьми); определение и обоснование целей использования алгоритма, принципов, которые фактически заложены в алгоритмическую систему (продукт); практическое руководство для разработчиков, позволяющее определить, когда им следует отступить, чтобы оценить возможные проблемы предвзятости в их продукте, и указание на методы, которые они могут использовать для решения задачи минимизации предвзятости; процедуры сравнительного анализа и критерии для выбора валидационных наборов данных для контроля качества смещения; методы установления и передачи информации и границы применения, для которых система была разработана, и валидации, для защиты от возникающих непредвиденных нежелательных последствий, возникающих в результате применения алгоритмов за пределами указанных границ; методы управления ожиданиями пользователей для уменьшения погрешности из-за неправильной интерпретации результатов работы системы пользователями; и другие, которые еще предстоит определить [37]
Summary
Исследование выполнено в рамках Программы развития Междисциплинарной научно-образовательной школы Московского университета «Математические методы анализа сложных систем». Предвзятость алгоритмов искусственного интеллекта: вопросы этики и права теллекта и больших данных применяются в различных сферах бизнеса для упрощения и ускорения принятия разного рода и значимости решений.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.