Abstract
The authors of the article refer to the concept and signs of a sham deal, paying special attention to the sign of the coincidence of the parties in the covering and disguised deals. Based on the analysis of judicial practice in bankruptcy cases, the conditions for qualifying as sham several consecutive transactions covering a single transaction for the withdrawal of the debtor’s assets are identified. The problem of the presence of a sign of coincidence of the initial and final parties of transactions in a chain of sham transactions is considered separately. A conclusion is formulated about the coincidence of the initial and final parties of transactions and in the case of a sequence of interrelated transactions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
