Abstract
Сhanges in civil legislation have created a separate type of tort obligations, in which the state compensates for damage caused to the person or property of a citizen or the property of a legal entity by lawful actions of public authorities. Along with the tort obligations that are well covered in the scientific literature, these issues concerning the lawful actions of the State that cause harm to citizens or legal entities are ignored. In the article, the author conducts a comparative legal analysis of the conditions for the emergence of obligations to compensate for damage caused by lawful actions of the state. The research is based on general scientific methods of cognition, as well as special legal ones (comparative legal, technical legal, formal legal). On the basis of the conducted research, the author draws conclusions about the legal nature of the obligations under study, and also makes an attempt to identify the existing problems of the emergence of obligations to compensate for damage caused by lawful actions of state bodies. The main problem of the study of obligations to compensate for harm is to determine the conditions of their occurrence, the characteristics of lawful harm caused by state bodies, leading to the emergence of obligations to compensate for harm. Obligations to compensate for rightfully caused harm are conditioned by the protection of subjective rights. These obligations exist for the purpose of compensation for the restoration of the right violated by the lawful actions of State bodies in the event that public interests prevail over personal ones. Examining tort obligations, as the most widely covered in the scientific literature, it was concluded that they are very similar to obligations for compensation for rightfully caused harm, and pursue the same goal: restoring the position of the injured person.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call