Abstract

A Buy-to-rent public housing is one of the types of public housing stipulated in “SPSPECIAL ACT ON PUBLIC HOUSING”, and the supply of public housing is a responsibility for the people of the state and local governments under “FRFRAMEWORK ACT ON RESIDENCE”. However, supplying such public housing requires considerable resources, and housing prices, which have already risen significantly due to years of rising private housing prices, also adversely affect the construction and supply of new housing. In this reality of housing supply, the president has been controversial by directly discussing the government's plan to purchase unsold private houses and supply them cheaply as public housing. In this paper, we examine whether the government's housing policy plan is an accurate policy under the current public housing related laws. In the theoretical sector, we examine the history of human rights and residential rights, and examine whether state intervention for legislative rights is possible under the “CONSTITATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA” ideology and system to check unilateral exercise of power through separation of powers such as executive power and executive power. In addition, the question of the legitimacy of the government's housing policy plan to unilaterally apply the policy on behalf of a specific area is reviewed through the Principle of Professionalism and equality established in “CONSTITATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA”. We examine whether the above government's public housing supply plan is feasible through a review of the budget related to public housing. In addition, we examine ‘a Jense frand’, which has recently become a big problem in the housing sector, and propose mandatory ‘registration of rights to release on a deposition basis’ and ‘registration of leasehold interest’ as a legal improvement.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call