Abstract
Purpose: This paper compares and analyzes the rules of origin for the Korea-China FTA and the APTA, which are in effect between Korea and China, and are often mistaken for the same agreement.
 Research design, data, and methodology: This paper uses comparative legal methods and case analysis focusing on the Korea-China FTA and APTA origin regulations.
 Results: There are differences in the tariff reduction method, target items, country-oforigin standards, and follow-up applications to the tariffs under the Korea-China FTA and APTA.
 Conclusions: The Korea-China FTA and APTA are similar, but there are some differences, so it is necessary to compare and choose which agreement is more advantageous when applying tariffs on imported goods.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
