Abstract

The relevance of the problem we are investigating lies in the fact that in recent years, the influence of unsatisfactory psychosocial, environmental factors and the biopsychosocial essence of a person leads to a violation of adaptation, the development of stress, the formation of psychosomatic disorders. This is also explained by the aggravation of contradictions. The purpose of the study was to explain the role of temperament in stressful influences by studying the methods of psychophysiological testing of students of various courses under the influence of examination stress, which is a model of emotional stress. The need for the development of a modern person as a person is becoming ever higher. There are several main criteria for assessing a person: social productivity, tolerance to emotional stress, creativity, special position in society, etc. All criteria are involved in the full formation of a person's personality and are considered important for assessing the level of his development. It is known that psychoemotional stress plays an important role in the occurrence of a number of serious diseases. Materials and methods. The study involved 5 phlegmatic male teenagers aged 18 years studying at the Faculty of Biology and Chemistry. In 18-year-old phlegmatic persons, the difference in assessments of situational and individual anxiety is obvious on a typical day, before and after the exam. It also depends on the nature and type of species. Measurement and comparison of the level of situational excitability on ordinary days among young people of 18 years old shows that among four groups (phlegmatic, choleric, sanguine and melancholic) the level of situational excitability on ordinary days does not differ significantly. Results and discussion. The results obtained during the study indicate that there is the effect of examination stress on the level of situational excitability of young people with phlegmatic type. Thus, an increased level of excitability in persons with a phlegmatic type against the background of the examined emotional stress can lead to changes in the state of human health and manifestations of a number of diseases. Based on this, in the educational process, certain approaches are recommended in accordance with the characteristics of the types of the nervous system, in which some diseases can be prevented. Conclusion. Analysis of the numerical average between the level of situational excitability and the situation after the exam shows that the level of situational excitability in the situation before the exam was only slightly higher than in the situation after the exam. An analysis of the numerical average between personal anxiety and the post-exam situation shows that the personal anxiety level was at the same level before and after the exam, and the change was not significant

Highlights

  • Целью исследования явилось определение у учащихся 2 курса флегматического типа изменения уровня ситуативной и личностной возбудимости в обычный день, перед экзаменом и после экзамена, эмоционального напряжения, возникающего в зависимости от экзаменационного процесса

  • Анализ числового среднего между уровнем ситуативной возбудимости и ситуацией после экзамена показывает, что уровень ситуативной возбудимости студентов в ситуации до экзамена был лишь незначительно выше, чем в ситуации после экзамена

  • Но так как у сангвинического и меланхолического типов Р>0,05, то существенной разницы между уровнем личной возбудимости в обычные дни и уровнем личной возбудимости после обследования не наблюдалось, и существующая разница статистически не считается значимой на уровне 0,05

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Целью исследования явилось определение у учащихся 2 курса флегматического типа изменения уровня ситуативной и личностной возбудимости в обычный день, перед экзаменом и после экзамена, эмоционального напряжения, возникающего в зависимости от экзаменационного процесса. Сравнение уровней ситуативной тревожности в обычные дни между двумя независимыми группами показывает, что межгрупповая разница была статистически значимой и не имела значения на уровне 0,05. Сравнение уровней ситуативной тревожности в обычные дни между двумя независимыми группами также показывает, что межгрупповая разница была статистически значимой и не имела значения на уровне 0,05.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call