지방의회 정책지원관제도의 효과 분석

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of the local council policy support officer system. Empirically compare and analyze the satisfaction level between local council members and metropolitan council members with the recently introduced and implemented policy support officer system, satisfaction with legislative activities, and system improvement measures. There is something to do. For this purpose, a survey was conducted targeting local council members across the country, and a chi-square test was conducted to determine whether the difference in satisfaction with legislative activities between basic council members and metropolitan council members was statistically significant.
 Looking at the results, first, the majority of local council members were found to be satisfied with the policy support officer system, and the satisfaction of local council members was higher than that of metropolitan council members. Second, both local council members and metropolitan council members were found to have the highest level of satisfaction with legislative activities, followed by check and monitor activities, budget activities, and resident representative activities. Third, the difference in satisfaction with legislative activities between local council members and metropolitan council members was found to be statistically significant in legislative activities and checks and monitoring activities, but no differences were found in budget activities and resident representative activities. Fourth, in terms of institutional improvement measures, it was found that members of the local council most requested one policy support officer and members of the metropolitan council most requested one aide. Based on these analysis results, implications for the local council policy support system were presented.