Abstract

The article indicates that, depending on whose interests are put at the forefront, it is possible to talk about political-conjunctural, economic-centric, ecological-centric and homocentric models of agricultural management. In the absence of a comprehensive management model, it is necessary to state numerous and acute conflicts of interests - the state’s goal of increasing agricultural production may meet resistance from environmental organizations, the interest of agricultural workers in wage growth is not expected to find a response in terms of commercial goals of agricultural producers, because it leads to an increase in costs, etc. The target settings of each interested group should be considered not in isolation, but in a comprehensive manner, within the framework of the four-component management model proposed by the authors, implemented not only on the internal management circuit (micro-level, regional agrosystems), but also on the external management circuit (meso-level – agriculture of the country, macro-level – global agrosystems). The alignment and coordination of the interests of all parties is proposed to be achieved through the implementation of a program of public investment in the country’s agriculture.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call