Abstract
In this article I am developing Peter Strawsonʼs theory of moral responsibility. I am trying to show that it can be freed from sentimentalism and at the same time preserve what makes it attractive for metaphysical discussions about free will. The basis of my strategy is to rethink the concept of fittingness and give reasons the status that emotions have in Strawson’s view.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
