Abstract
The paper handles the topic of Engineering Arbitration in Sudan as one of the mechanisms of dispute resolution in engineering contracts, by mentioning parts of the international experience embodied in the FIDIC forms of engineering contracts along with the developments in Sudanese laws associated with arbitration. The paper then summaries one of themajor arbitration cases in Sudan; namely the Social Insurance Towers in Khartoum as an example. Typical reasons that lead to construction disputes, both from international experiences and Sudanese practice, are listed. Having quoted the main constraints facing engineering arbitration in Sudan, the paper concludes by giving some pertinent recommendations to enhance and advance this effective mechanism of resolving engineering disputes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
