Abstract
This study was conducted to identify the problems of various public interest activity classification systems currently in use in Korea and to propose a rational improvement plan for the classification system of nonprofit public interest activities in Korea. For the research, we analyzed major domestic and international public interest activity classification systems in terms of analysis units, classification criteria, and response rules. We reviewed the advantages and disadvantages according to the classification system evaluation criteria. The public interest activity classification system proposed in this study takes 'public interest activities' performed at the level of non-profit organizations or individuals as the unit of analysis. The first essential classification criterion is the 'main activity and service area' (10 items), and the second optional classification criteria are 'main beneficiaries' (14 items), 'main spatial range' (4 items), 'main method of performance' (6 items), 'online activity status' (3 items), and 'connection with official organizations' (2 items). The classification system of this study has strengths in terms of logical consistency, exclusivity between classification items, economy, and rich combinability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.