ЭКСПАНСИЯ МИРОВОЗЗРЕНИЯ И ПРЕОДОЛЕНИЕ ДИСКУРСА ВЛАСТИ

Abstract

Abstract. Introduction. The article analyzes the process of spreading the worldview to an external audience. The problem is that most often the exhibited worldview becomes a part of the power's expansion in the minds of both: those who perceive and promote it. In particular, the expansion of the religious worldview is associated with violence not only historically, but also structurally, in such a way that violence acts as an integral part of it. The problem is how to distance itself from the discourse of power, despite the fact that it is rooted in the very ideological structure of Christianity and is one of its main provisions . Purpose. The purpose of the article is to designate the least traumatic form of communication of representatives of different worldviews . Methods. The principles of the “philosophy of dialogue” (F. Ebner, F. Rosenzweig, M. Buber, M. Bakhtin) are applied to solve the designated problem. Also applied the method of theological analysis of the sacred texts. Results. The author draws attention to the simultaneous presence and equal ontological significance of both the discourse of violence and the discourse of love in the framework of one set of ideological statements. In Christianity, the sublime discourse of love is characterized by a maximum appreciation of the personality and the absence of hierarchy. But human culture for the most part has not yet been divorced from the dictates of evolutionary tasks. Even religion in this context is absorbed by the realization of instincts. To get out of the discourse of power and totality to the dialogue of personalities, correlating their fundamental ideological positions, an existential act of overcoming the evolutionary determination of the parameters of human communication is necessary. Originality. The article presents the manifestation of one's own consciousness in the face of Another as an existential act of overcoming the evolutionary parameters of human communication. The idea of manifestation of consciousness as the least traumatic form of representation of the Outlook is qualitatively new in comparison with a large number of techniques of distribution of theoretical part of the Outlook. Conclusion. The correlation of paradigmatic axioms can be thought only as a manifestation of one's own consciousness in order to be understood by the interlocutor, and not to force him to consent. In this case, trust in the evidence of other experience is a necessary condition for the dialogue of worldviews.