Abstract
The stories from the two coaches of the National Boxing Teams who have experiences planning and coaching the 2016 National Boxer selection process as well as observing their participation in the first half of first half of the Asian Qualification Tournament in order to secure the Rio Olympic tickets were selected as narratives to be analyzed as a part of a qualitative research method in which in depth 1:1 interviews are conducted five to six times and the corresponding recordings are presented and reconstructed to fit the research topic. A former national boxer participated in the study and drew findings based on the research journals and self-narrative analysis. First, there were limitations in improving the performance in matches with limited domestic athletes and insufficient off-season training and little experience. Second, a lack of experts who can resolve diplomatic conflicts at the Asian competition sites resulted in receiving an unfair verdict from AIBA(Amateur International Boxing Association) judges. Third, with insufficient budget support from the national boxing team to participate in the Rio Olympics, the team lacked opportunities to gain hands-on experience with foreign players through overseas training.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
