Abstract
The article discusses the impact on the penal legislation the results of the type of innovation activity such as technologies, and the readiness of the domestic legislator for their appearance. The author comes to the conclusion that in order to comply with the rule of legislative technique on the unity of the terminology used, it is advisable in the text of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation to replace the phrase “audiovisual, electronic and other technical means of supervision and control” with “special technical means of control and supervision” and fix in the legal act a specific list of technical means for various types of correctional institutions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
