Государственный интерес: рефлексивно-практическая призма Мишеля Фуко

Abstract

Domestic literature on the problem of state interests (hereinafter SI) reflects, with a few exceptions, the history and modern moment of existence and vision of the political conjuncture of the country and the world dominating minorities of Russia. There are more than 11 million sites in Runet. Most of these publications have no scientific value. They can serve as many examples as possible of how the viewpoint of the public interest depends on the country’s political fluctuations and the arbitrariness of its minorities. Dependence and arbitrariness consist in the interpretation of the MI in relation to the national interests of Russia, although “…what means this expression of national interests, nobody knows exactly”. The author of the article develops the approach of K. Marx to the SI as an element of the bureaucratic attitude of the authorities towards citizens, the state towards the general state. This approach makes it possible to give permanence to the treatment of the SI, since there are still no States free from bureaucracy as a social parasite, reflecting social differences and embodying political exclusion. To take power, the USSR’s innovators had created economic, social, political, and ideological preconditions for the total bureaucratization of the State. This tradition is inherited and reinforced by the ruling minority of modern Russia. Therefore, the author proposes to raise and discuss the problem of violence and political lack of talent of the dominant minorities of Russia as a set of products of bureaucratic domination in all spheres of state policy and administration. In recent years, this approach has received a specific sociological justification4, including the qualification of the present Russian state as a parasitic one5. This article continues the author’s reconstruction of the heuristic potential of Michel Foucault’s SI concept.