Abstract
The article examines the conflict and gaps of civil legislation in the definition of the concept of “federal treasury” and the property that can be included in it. A detailed and close analysis of Articles 214 and 1071 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Civil Code of the Russian Federation) leads us to the conclusion that the position of the legislator on the use of the term “treasury” remains insufficiently defined; it is used in two different, moreover, in opposite meanings: both as an object of civil legal relations and as a subject. As a result of the study, it is concluded that such a collision is not accidental, it has historical roots. The article also analyzes the features of the composition of the property of the federal treasury. As a result, the authors come to the conclusion that it is necessary to clarify the purpose for the objects of property of the federal treasury.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
