Abstract

The article talks about the role of D. Chyzhevsky in redefining the paradigm of Ukrainian romanticism, since Soviet canons are still being explored in his theory and history. In particular, emphasis was placed on confronting such ideological basis as: avoiding any mysticism; refusal of psycho-intimate immersion; the imposition of revolutionary and democratic tendencies; pan-realism; the militant nature of romanticism and the genesis of its origins from German idealism. Chizhevsky proposed instead: the recognition of the heart as the center of romantic aesthetics; peculiarity and singularity of Ukrainian romantic philosophy; syncretic ideology instead of “militancy”; giving preference to the psychological and intuitive space in romanticism; nationally creative potency and oneiric and mystical poetry. Among the main features of “Ukrainian romanticism” is: 1) the identification of interest in the figure and philosophy of G. Skovoroda, that is, the historical continuity of ideas, and, therefore, the inconvenience of the emergence of romanticism; 2) the birth of Ukrainian romantic literature is connected with the development of a certain ideology that belongs to the masses and spiritualized them; 3) nationality is a cross-cutting feature of romantic literature; 4) the cult of antiquity; 5) the desire to get closer to the ideal of “complete” literature, create the relations with other literatures, etc. D. Chyzhevsky distinguished three schools of Ukrainian romanticism: Kiev, Kharkiv and Western Ukraine. Considered the representatives of the Ukrainian school of romanticism in Russia and Poland. He gave the motivation of A. Metlynsky’s work, outside the categories of reactionary and revolutionary romanticism (as well as other personalities). He emphasized the role of “History of Rus” and “Zaporozhian old days” to form a romantic historical vision, that is, the principle of historicism; and considered the most expressive of the many receptions of romanticism. Constantly stressed the tendency of romantics to God. The books of D. Chyzhevsky went to the Ukrainian reader long and hard, however, time sets its emphasis, neglecting all authority, because only the future knows what it will need for a new world.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.