Abstract

The article raises the problems of the Mennonite community's reflection on the reforms in Russian Empire as well as the modernization of social, political and economic environment in 1861–1914, during the First World War, the recurring power changes and political anarchy in Ukraine during the Civil War. The author examines the Mennonites' attempts to adjust the changes in reality, the cause-and-effect relationships of arising social crisis which ultimately led to the destruction of the ethnoreligious community's canonical foundations. The research bases on the testimonies of the eyewitnesses (given in their diaries), memoirs and other published materials. The author examines the gradual deviation processes among the Mennonite society that were transforming the fundamental statements of the congregations’ doctrine and their moral norms and traditions. It is analyzed whether the Russian-Ukrainian Mennonites remained an ethno-religious conglomerate or lost their inherent values. As a result it has been proved the following: the Mennonites in Russia in a short period from the beginning of the reforms of the 1860s – 1870s to the beginning of the 20th century, went from a close-knit religious community to an opened and spiritually weakened unification. During the period of “challenges and reactions” of the First World War and the Civil War, the leaders of the community were unable to maintain the unity and cohesion, a complex of moral and ethical markers, pacifist views, social institutions, which led to a deformation of values and disorientation in further actions. Only a small part of the Mennonites society was able to organize itself and, thanks to the support of the Canadian Mennonites communities, it emigrated in 1923–1926 and thus avoided the Bolshevik regime repressions.
 Key words: the Mennonites, World War I, Civil War, Makhno, identity.

Highlights

  • Автор розглядае спроби м ен о н тв пристосуватися до змш дшсносп, причинно-насл1дков1 зв’язки кризових сощальних явищ, що призвели у щцсумку до руйнування каноючних основ етнорелйшно! сшльноти

  • СЬап§т§ оР РЬе Кизз1ап Меппопйез’ оибоок апб 1Ье безРгисйоп оР Л ей сот т ипйу

  • ТЬе гезеагсЬ Ъазез оп Ле 1езЛпотез оР Ле еуе\уйпеззез (§1Уеп т Л ей Лапез), тетойз апб оЛег риЪЬзЬеб та!епа1з

Read more

Summary

16. Ьейегз оГа МеппопЬе Соир1е

Яизз1а: Шаг апб ЯеуоЬПюп 1914—1917.1пПобисеб апб ебПеб Ьу Теобог Яетре. Еш ТадеЬисЬ аиз б е т ЯеюЬе без ТоЩШапгез. ЬапбЬсЬе Цп1етеЬтег йп 8сЬ\уаг2теег§еЪеЬ Ше зибикгагшзсЬе ЬапбтазсЫпешпбизШе уое б е т Егз1еп ШеЬкпеб. «...баз епт§е Ьапб т Еигора, баз еше §гоЬе 2икипГуог з!сЬ ЬаР>. ВапЬгЬзбгепзГ апб ЗеШз&сЬиГг: Яиз81ап-МеппопЬе Копгез181апсе т Шог1б Шаг I апб Ьз АГ1егтаЙ1. ТЬу К т§ й о т С оте: ТЬе Б1агу оР .ГоЬапп I. Noске оР КозепЬоР: а Кесогй оР Ую1епсе апй РаЬЬ Бигш§ 1Ье Ки881ап Сш1 Шаг.

23. ТгоиЫез апй йтитрЬз
16. ЬеЬегз оР а МеппопЬе Соир1е
23. ТгоиЫез апй ГпитрЬз
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.