Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the status of appropriate community supporting systems through analysis of local government ordinances after deinstitutionalization of the disabled in the facility. To achieve this, Pusan government ordinance analysis was conducted. Since there is no deinstitutionalization support law, the existing ordinances related to deinstitutionalization of local governments are the basis. This is because macro-practice has a great influence on mezzo- and micro-practice. In this study, ordinances related to housing, lifelong education, communication support and human rights were analyzed as in the local independent living. Content analysis was used as the research method. As a framework for analysis, the composition of ordinances, rights and accountability, validity of the target scope, type and degree of benefits, financial responsibility, and securing of delivery system were used. In order to make a more active and persuasive argument, a comparative analysis was conducted with the ordinances related to deinstitutionalization in Seoul. Conclusions and recommendations are presented based on the analysis results.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.