Abstract

The article is a historiographical study devoted to the analysis of the signs of statehood of such actors of the Middle East policy as Hamas, Hezbollah and ISIS. The purpose of the work is to study the array of scientific literature and on the basis of the extracted data to conclude about the possession of the above actors signs of outcast states, “failed states” and quasi-state entities. Particular attention is paid to the research of individual cases (historical development and the current situation of Hamas, Hezbollah and ISIS), as well as to the works focused on the comparison of these actors. Modern authoritative scientific works on this subject, most of which relate to 2015-2019, were chosen as the basis of the study. The relevance of the study of the characteristics of these organizations is due to the need to expand knowledge about these terrorist groups, understanding of the processes taking place in the unstable Middle East region. On the basis of the literature studied, the author concludes that Hamas, Hezbollah and ISIS have features of both outcast states and “failed states” and quasi-state entities. The author also notes that due to the ongoing wars in the Middle East, the scientific interest in the study of quasi-state Middle Eastern actors in the historiographical sphere will only grow.

Highlights

  • Возникает необходимость переосмысления понятий «государственность» и «государственная состоятельность»

  • The article is a historiographical study devoted to the analysis of the signs of statehood of such actors of the Middle East policy as Hamas, Hezbollah and ISIS

  • On the basis of the literature studied, the author concludes that Hamas, Hezbollah and ISIS have features of both outcast states and “failed states” and quasi-state entities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Возникает необходимость переосмысления понятий «государственность» и «государственная состоятельность». Некоторые политические акторы на Ближнем Востоке (ИГИЛ, «Хезболла», ХАМАС) приближаются к образованию де-факто государств, однако, не обладая полным набором необходимых признаков, являются, скорее, квазигосударственными образованиями. Ротберг [Rotberg, 2002], международная система зависит от каждого отдельного государства, она рассчитывает на его состоятельность как на гарант международной безопасности.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.