Abstract
The article examines the issues of the validity of qualifying an increase in the authorized capital (in the absence of profit distribution) as income for tax purposes. According to the author, if the increase in the authorized capital is due to retained earnings (proportional increase in the nominal value of the participants' shares without changing the size of the shares) is not an element of a tax scheme, it is a common practice of investment behavior that does not generate income for participants or shareholders.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
