공개제한 공간정보 보안심사 전문기관제도에 대한 법제 개선 방안 연구

Abstract

Recently, one of the important policy changes related to the national policy of such spatial information is that spatial information with restricted disclosure is not provided to geospatial information providers or location information providers in principle, and spatial information with restricted disclosure can be provided based on the results of the security review by a specialized security review organization. Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) The government’s policy on geospatial information is related to the private sector-oriented dynamic economy. This is reflected in the reason for legislating the provision of publicly restricted spatial information in the Basic Act on National Geospatial Information. In relation to this government policy, it is necessary to balance the responsibilities and operational tasks, such as the uniformity of the operation of security review agencies and the agenda of public officials in applying penalties to security review agencies, in relation to the system of designating security review agencies in relation to the provision of spatial information restricted from public disclosure. Considering these points, it is possible to consider deleting paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 24 of the Enforcement Decree of the Basic Act on National Geospatial Information as a way to improve the legislation. In addition, it is necessary to eliminate the difference in the inspection format of the security inspection standards during the security inspection (written and on-site) related to the provision of spatial information restricted from public disclosure by each specialized security inspection agency. However, in this case, it is necessary to adopt a method that can comprehensively check quantitative and qualitative matters in the inspection format of security inspection standards. Regarding the scope of users of restricted spatial information, it is necessary to expand the scope of current users. In this case, the provisions of the “management organization” in Article 2, paragraph 4 of the Basic Act on National Geospatial Information should be applied to include public institutions and other private organizations as users of restricted spatial information. Finally, it is also necessary to establish a legal basis for the designation of spatial data safety zones in order to respond to the demand of economically small private companies to provide spatial data that is restricted from disclosure by establishing Article 36.2 of the Basic Act on National Geospatial Information.