Abstract

This article explores sociocultural and education-structural factors that have exerted significant limits on national curriculum reform for school physical education (PE) in the United States (U.S.). Based on prior research and discourses, three primary education-contextual issues that circumscribe extensive curriculum reform were found: socioeconomic and cultural disparities in student population, the longstanding tradition of multiple-layered governance structure, and an deeply held conviction about an idiosyncratic/localized curricular approach among educational professionals. An overly rigid national curriculum has the potential to prompt diverse ideological issues such as inequitable learning opportunities, a hegemony of knowledge, and the reproduction of divisions among groups of students. It would seem to be advisable for extensive curricular reform for school-based PE to be initiated voluntarily at the state or local level to reduce any potential resistance or anti-sentiment from lower level government entities. PE curriculum must be socioculturally responsive, locally flexible, and aligned with the needs and interests of individual students.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call