Abstract
The article is devoted to the consideration of critical reviews of Stalin's publications by Soviet Marxists in the first half of the 1920s. The authors intend to reveal to what extent Stalin's theoretical views were alien or, on the contrary, organically inherent in the intellectual environment of that period. The researchers analyze reviews in the leading journals of the time, written by thinkers with different political biographies and professional positions. They come to the conclusion that the works of I.V. Stalin were not perceived in the early Soviet period either as "brilliant" or as "revisionist" and did not stand out much against the background of the new cultural landscape.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Izvestiya of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. History Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
